Wednesday, April 25, 2018

2013 Orvis Endorsed Expedition of the Year Award!

We thank our guests! Because of your kind words and reviews of our service, we were awarded the Orvis Endrosed Expedition of the Year Award for 2013! This was the third year in a row we were nominated for this award, winning twice and runner up once! Once again, we remain the first and only Canadian company to win this award, with only one other company ever winning an Orvis Endorsed award in the 27 years of existence (and congrats to Camp Bonaventure in Bonaventure, Quebec this year!)
 
We look forward to hosting you this coming season. We strive to make your trip the best possible fo the conditions and situations present at the time of your trip. With any luck the fishing goes well, but our goal is to ensure everything else is as wonderful as possible.
 
Thank you to everyone who was a guest in 2012 and thank you to everyone who has booked a trip (Fortress Lake Retreat or our Fly Fish Alberta Guided trips). We appreciate you and this award is only reflective of our guests. Thank You!
 
If you would like to view the Orvis video behind what this award means, please watch this video:

Wednesday, March 28, 2018

On the Up & Up

If you look to the top right of the present layout of this blog, you'll notice a new video we just posted "On the Up & Up". It's a fun moment from our latest trip to New Zealand with a full flex rod. Yes, we're Orvis Endorsed. No, it's not a shameful plug. Yes, we really do love the Superfine rods. No we don't use them in every situation. Yes, we'd recommend the rods for Alberta trout waters. They can handle a lot and have an amazing feel. We hope you enjoy this latest vid!
The good news is the season is coming on strong. There'll be some early season headaches with weather and water condtions, but things will roll soon enough!

Monday, March 26, 2018

Easter weekend, eh?

Apparently it has been a long winter around Alberta. We've been back from New Zealand for a month and while we missed the 3 harshest months I'm not sure that we would want to enjoy much more cross country skiing in the cold, cloudy weather that's been lingering. It's fairly well within typical for early spring though.
Sweet forecast this week, mind you! And I'm sure that the opening day of April 1 coupled with an Easter holiday weekend will no doubt see hordes on Stauffer Cr. Maybe a few will poke around into some of the smaller spring creeks that somehow managed to remain ice free through the cold of this winter. But 95% of the water will be frozen. It looks to be nice weather for a drive for Friday and Saturday.
And with the present forecast and sunshine, there will even be a few bugs. Small black stones (think a black trude in #16 to 20) will be out and about. You might even see a rise or two. Maybe a brown or rocky will take a nymph or streamer. It all depends on just how the conditions line up for you - your fishing.
But, like every season, the weather will be fickle. A slow build up to the nicest day, followed by a collapse. These early, warm spells just can't sustain themselves around central Alberta. There's simply too much snow, too much mountain and arctic influence to keep things steady. So, while the forecast is for nice weather now, make sure you leave yourself enough lee-way to get out when the weather is actually good. The collapse always leaves things empty, cold, cloudy, and quite slow.
Of course, it seldom is the fishing success that leads many out this time of year. These early trips are the t-ball to the season. It's a time to set the ball on the T and take a few swings. There's nothing over the top that happens for most. It's an exercise in setting the season up. And many, may will this coming weekend, so keen up the happy social skills and make a new friend.
If it's fish you are after, maybe turn your attention to the lower Oldman, Crowsnest, or Bow. Less temperamental rainbows and more fish per km await. And it looks to be a very nice forecast down that way as well.
But for us in central Alberta, while the weather is coming nicely, it will be another 6 weeks yet before we see marsh marigolds bring in the first good waves of pmds. By then, hopefully, the skwalas, smattering of tiny to small stones, and a few olives will have come off, bringing a few nice browns to hand.

Saturday, March 24, 2018

New Zealand trout need more than a little help

In case Canadians thought that the recent changes to our Fisheries Act were substantive, the New Zealand govt is now planning on essentially eliminating habitat protection for trout and salmon. It's a scary change, one that pits agriculture, oil, gas, ahead of all else. This change, while trumping industrial use over all other values, may provide short term economic gain, however, the international repute and standards of trade will come under much scrutiny. Of course, New Zealand is banking on continued growth in trade with the Chinese - of whom most of us know their environmental standard. Please, if you have the time, please take the time to respond to this insanity through the means below. While you may or may not have ever fished New Zealand, plan to or not to travel there, this is a direct threat to the fabled waters. This summer, many waters were literally sucked dry by irrigation as New Zealand endured the worst drought in 30 years after the worst floods in 30 years hit the S Island. It is that sensitive to environmental condition yet the current govt is ready to give industrial use full reign, lock, stock, and barrel. This is a direct copy from New Zealand Fish & Game:
 
25th March 2013

Future of freshwater fishing under threat

Dear Reel Life reader,
The present government is hell-bent on wrecking the RMA. The key points are as follows:
1. The RMA is being dramatically changed to allow the development and degradation of sports fish and game habitat by farmers and industry.
2. Lowland streams will have no legal recognition so will become 'farm drains'.
3. Water Conservation Orders will ultimately go, with their previously recognised habitat protection and recreation values lost in one- size-fits-all 'regional plans'.
4. Practically all the substantive case law that has been developed over the years around environmental protection (much of it with Fish & Game licence fees), will be lost.
5. Current protection of the habitat of trout and salmon will be scrapped.
This is a plea for all anglers to ensure they have their say on the future of the RMA, the only real safeguard we have against rampant, unsustainable development of the freshwater resources trout and salmon rely on for survival.
You only have until 5.00pm April 2, 2013 to submit on the RMA.
Submission on the equally devastating Freshwater Reform proposals must be received by 5.00pm April 8, 2013.
Don't worry if you have never made a submission before – it can be as simple or as complex as you choose to make it, the most important thing is that you have a say.
Information on how to make a submission, suggested points to make in your submission, and where to send it are on our RMA resource page here.
Please, stand up for freshwater quality protection and the future of angling in this country – it's in your hands.
Bryce Johnson
Chief executive
Fish & Game NZ
Fish & Game NZ, 2 Jarden Mile, PO Box 13-141, Wellington. Tel: (04) 499 4767

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

IF4 Red Deer - Something warm on a snowy night!

If the latest snow ahs you down, come on out to the IF4 Film Festival in Red Deer. Warm fly fishing on a late winter's snowy day... :)
Tickets are $15 on line or $20 at the door...
http://flyfilmfest.com/IF4/get-tickets/

Saturday, March 17, 2018

The long slope down...

There is a strong sense of vulnerability in this blog post. We all have our low points. We all have heart felt moments. We all have moments where life just goes our way. This blog post has all the above... and ties in to what we always say is so true for us: that fly fishing is an extension of, enmeshed in, ingrained in, and inseparable from our lives.

Before we left for New Zealand, Amelia had some eye work done. She has Keratoconus, which is a slow degeneration of the corneas: rather than remain round, over a lifetime they become cone shaped and thin to the point - worst case scenario - you may end up needing corneal transplants. She had a relatively new procedure done about 3 or 4 weeks before we left for New Zealand that has shown to slow or cease that degeneration. About a week prior to leaving, she had a follow up at her optometrist and her eyes were considerably worse than prior to the procedure due to the corneal cross-linking treatment and riboflavin additive to strengthen her corneas. Things usually get worse before they get better, so this way expected.

Anyone see what could possibly go wrong with embarking on 3 months of sight-fishing in New Zealand?
(Her eyesight has gotten better since, the surgery knocked it back and she's gotten way better).

We knew it was going to be a little difficult at times of our trip, but up against -40C and the dark winters of Alberta, Canada, we weren't foregoing New Zealand!

Once we arrived, at the start of this year's trip, we decided to try to get the smallest of things corrected in Amelia's fishing. I've long thought Amelia was a good fly fisher, but there were subtle little things here or there that could take her to being a great fly fisher, and a lot of it has had to do with letting the killer instinct take over and allow her sub-conscious do the things in fly fishing that need to be done, in order that her present mind could pro-actively anticipate and adjust to ensure that the situation and fish didn't control the show. It's subtle, but a world of difference that few fly fishers get to.

Yes, we decided to do the above at the same time as her eyes were recovering.
Genius.
The first three weeks of our trip to New Zealand were good weather. It was a mix of sun and cloud and the wind came and went. There were some cold, windy days where it didn't quite reach double digits in the high country. But we really got on a roll, and Amelia was working into some of the subtle improvements nicely. Honestly, we didn't miss much - to the point it was a little tedious.

About 2 weeks into our trip, we fished with a new fellow, Jack, whom we wound up befriending and fishing with again later in the trip. We'll touch on that later, but the first time we fished together, it's important to say that we nailed everything we touched. At that time of the trip, Amelia was calling Jack over to have a go at fish that we sighted as she was literally nailing everything and wanted to make sure that he was getting in on fish equally. About the only thing she was not excelling at was casting into the Nor'wester wind. She got by though and she was certainly catching the fish.

About a week after fishing with Jack, Amelia and I were fishing the back end of a paddock. We were on our way out and we took turns closing electric fence gates. Amelia was closing one. I'd walked through and saw a narrow ditch covered in grass. After the long day, I didn't say anything and assumed she'd see it. Nope! She turned and fell up to her mid thigh in the ditch. To make matters worse, there was an old fence post in it and it jammed her thigh. She was left with quite a skid mark and deep bruise on her thigh. The next 2 weeks were brutal on her as she recovered.

About 10 days after her boo boo, the rains came in. Hard. For the next month and a week, literally every 18 to 72 hrs a <relatively> major rain front came in. The worst was one deep low that dropped over 600mm of rain (think 24 vertical inches) fell in about 20 hrs. Most fronts had 100 (4") - 300 (12") mm as they came and went. It wasn't so much the rain and high waters (you can always find clear water to fish in New Zealand, even after 24" of rain) that became an issue as the cloud. Perpetual cloud.

Let's go back to Amelia's eyes. It was one thing to have her eyes not focus as well. However, the one thing that quickly became apparent was contrasting situations were difficult for her to see well. 5 weeks of cloudy skies didn't help as the glare on the water gave her fits, drove her nuts.

Through the dark, dull weather days, Amelia's eyes took over. I noticed her concentration on the finer points we'd worked on slowly gave way while she fished. Going away was the subtle mend as she laid the line out. In its place was the oft repeated "I can't see my fly" or "I can't see the fish" as her fly drift. She began to focus on the optics ans less on allowing her subconscious deal with the fundamentals. And the slightest of currents would slowly take over her drift. Sometimes her eyes would play tricks on depth perception and she'd land the fly 6" upstream of the fish instead of the 2 or 3 feet, her eyes and the contrast obviously taking the toll. It got to the point that her feel of the rod in her casts was sometimes replaced with being so focused on seeing what was going on rather than simply feeling. And honestly, it was difficult to watch the downward trend. She was still getting takes from almost every fish, but the difference was that she was inducing short takes or worse, downstream takes which she sometimes didn't see. If you know anything about visual, downstream takes, you know you have to have a keen eye to see the turn: to not wait and see the trout turn leads to a clear miss. If you can't see in the glare, or are having a tough time focusing, it's a killer. So, what was causing her to have these subtle errors was compounded in that she couldn't anticipate, adjust, nor compensate for the errors caused by them.

On last year's trip, she went 3 and a half weeks without missing a fish. It was likely the most amazing run I've ever seen from anyone I've ever fished with. She didn't miss a single one. Fast forward to this trip and she likely got a take on 80 - 90% of the fish on the back half of our trip, but I bet you she missed 1/3 of them because she couldn't see the take or because her depth perception was off, inducing a bad take. (I know, we're nit-picking here because she still caught a ton of fish and we do get pretty high results in New Zealand, of all places. But when your standards are high, they just are)

And it got to her. I'll admit it got to me, it was tough to watch. Honestly, my fishing also took a bit of a hit as well. Not that I was missing fish nor doing anything poorly... my intensity and desire to fish waned slightly. When you know your spouse isn't going 100%, your desire to put the hammer down and fish hard yourself wanes. It does with anyone truth be told. If I'm fishing with someone who isn't as experienced or not as likely to have good success I've always tended to give way, passing up fish or turns at fish to their benefit. Sometimes many, many fish in a row (you just want for people to be successful and joyful while fly fishing!). Most people are oblivious when I do give way, but Amelia certainly wouldn't be! It was really, really odd... strange... to find myself remotely thinking this way with Amelia.

It got to the point that when we again fished with our friend Jack with 3 weeks to go in our trip, her confidence was wavering and now he was trying to help her with a couple of things. That's nothing against him at all, but it was very telling that at the start of our trip she was calling him over to catch fish, and now he was helping her even feel a cast into the wind. It was a subtle difference but knowing my wife well, I could see it plainly.

The pinnacle came on a spring creek we were fishing during a back country raft float of a larger river. It wasn't an easy day of fishing. The browns were doggo in the main river (literally still as can be, not feeding, maybe looking at a fly if it came within 6" of its head as it sat along the rocks on the bottom of the very recesses of the tailouts in the warm water). By the time we got to the spring creek, our patience wasn't great for doggo fish. The spotting conditions were so-so as we waded upstream into a mixed sunset. We came onto more doggo, yet slightly spooky fish in the lower reaches. We eventually landed a nice 7lb brown a little further up, finally finding an actual feeding fish that I presented a wee nymph to.

It was Amelia's turn. Her confidence in a straight ahead cast with heavy bush behind us was iffy. Having gone 6 weeks of tough lighting and sighting and not being perfect as she & I have come to expect of her(self), she was now relying on me and/or Jack to tell her what was going on. It is a massive difference to have the full confidence of "I've got this" and simply step up, have faith in your gear & set up, to then position yourself in the best location, and make the simplest cast to get the fish. (Note that I didn't say best cast - I replaced that with simplest cast because that includes the best cast and location). That was in stark contrast to her posture at that moment. She remained standing in the middle of being shoulder to shoulder with Jack and I, with me being on the downstream edge, and the shoreline was covered with heavy bush. All she had to do was switch spots with me and her back cast was monumentally clearer. She didn't see the fish Jack was pointing to in the darkening glare of the sun going behind the mountain. She saw one of the rises but not all, and couldn't see where the fish would station. And because she had been on a downward trend in confidence, her casting was at an all time low. I honestly hadn't seen her cast so inconsistent and erratic in 10 years by that evening.

She was giving way to Jack & I in casting position, spotting, and not feeling her casts... and wasn't taking a confident charge to the fish.

It was tough to watch. It had to be tough for her.

Being there, fishing with someone new, making a new friend but standing watching your wife struggle, knowing why... and not being able to say anything to help because I didn't want to make her feel less in front of someone else by saying anything to help which could have been taken the wrong way by her or Jack... it was very tough. I watched. I kept my mouth shut best I could.

To complete the sequence, on one of her casts, a drift fly she couldn't see and was waiting for help, there was a rise. In her defense, Jack told her to set. Knowing she was late, she ripped the hook set. I was watching and cringed because I had seen the rise - the fish had taken a mayfly 3 feet from her fly and even Jack had missed the location of the rise. Of course, now the fish was going to be gone for all that commotion.

It went further than that mind you. We stood silently a spell. The water was calm. Nothing happened. I grabbed the rod from Amelia as I anticipated we'd continue upstream. We all spoke of where the fish had been holding. Amelia finally was able to see the spot where it had been. I never did see it from where I was, but I flipped a left handed cast in that area and asked "where in relation to that?" Jack said "About 3 feet further up and to the left". I then looked down at my reel as I began to wind up the line. "SET!" the two of them cried out.

I had the fish, naturally. I now had 2 fish and not only did Jack not have one, but I just Trumped my wife in front of someone else at a time she was low. Not so HOO-RAY for me given I knew where my wife was at - not at all. It was, after all, just a fish. My wife, after all, needed my support. I had to find a way of delicately giving my support to her with someone else there at a time she felt lowest about her fishing and all the factors leading to being so low.

Just to salt the wound, about 10 minutes later we came about a nice trout and it was Jack's turn. There had to be a fish in the run we were coming to. None of us saw anything. I decided to walk around, staying low. I was 3/4 up the run, toward the shelving riffle at the top, walking painfully slow. In the glow of the yet light, blueing, twilight sky I saw a gold slithering arch of a gorgeous brown turning to take an emerging mayfly 3 feet off shore. I called instructions to Jack and on his first cast the dry went down, the fish sucking the dropper nymph. Exciting! Jack had an amazing trout of 8 1/2 pounds. It was a stunning fish that was an awe-inspiring moment for all of us. What a creek. What an evening. It was stunning. We all took a lot of joy in Jack's fish and the air electric. We were all buzzing. It's still amazing to see Jack's fish in our photos.

From my perspective, and to Amelia's credit, more because it's who she is and not that she would even consider sulking, she was as excited as anyone about Jack's fish. It was amazing. I've fished with one or two people who, if things don't go their way, you don't even want to fish until they catch something... anything... for their sulking, simmering anger, or tense silence - and those types usually can't even see it in themselves. Amelia doesn't have such a bone in her body.

It was getting a little late in the day - it had been a long one as we'd pre-shuttled the cars, put the raft in the river, floated 6 hrs, and fished a few hours up this spring creek. If we saw another trout, it was Amelia's. And this is where I give Amelia all the credit in the world. The biggest compliment I can give her and the thing I admire the absolute most in her is her tenacity in pursuit of a positive end goal. She was down but no way was she done.

We walked upstream in the glow of Jack's cracker of a brown. I'd say that you couldn't have had a more amazing evening, except that I knew that while Amelia was glowing for experiencing Jack's fish, that she was wanting a turn-around herself. Not 100m above Jack's fish, I saw a rise for the ages. There are browns that move water... and this was one that was moving water. Jack & I stationed on the opposite bank and with the dark, bush reflection, could see the fish's every movement. It was going to town... no insect was making it downstream. Amelia was in the water, we were calling out its movements, left, right, up, down... waaaay across. Knowing my wife, I knew the energy in her was palpable, consuming.

It was time.

Her cast landed to its right. The elk hair caddis a perfect silhouette against the now steel glare where she landed it. For both Jack and I, we'd seen the fish in the glare free water to the left. We both commented later that all we saw was the fish, saw it turn as the fly landed, and then disappeared in the glare. Jack and I both excitedly called (shouted?) out "HE'S COMING!!!"

I hadn't learned the lesson. Amelia neither. She or I could have set a boundary and simply said that "she's got it, so don't say a word". In fact, she needed to. But, she didn't have that poise and both Jack and I wanted to help her. Instead, our calling out so excitedly no doubt froze her rod tip in the air rather than lowered on the water, leaving tip slack - I guarantee it. Her hook set... ugh! Her hook set zipped through the HUGE lips of the large brown as it broke the steel surface.

She missed? It missed? She missed. No matter.

It was a heartbreaking moment as nothing came of the hook set.

I had my face in my hands. I mumbled, hissed, exasperated, to Jack "That was the fish of the day!"

Actually, it was a moment in my wife's life I was happy to be present for. And this is where I admire her most. She knew she was bottomed out. She knew it was on her to pull herself out. And she needed a lucky break to help.

And she got it.

The fish began rising once again.

And she stepped up. She turned to Jack & I and said "Don't say a word. I've got this".

Jack and I shut our traps.

The line sang through the guides of our Helios. The line shot with a zip I'd not seen in a few weeks. It laid out perfectly, gently. The fly landed two or three feet from the fish - perfect for New Zealand. Jack & I were silent as we again watched the fish disappear from the window into the glare. The brown's head broke with a slurping pop.

The sound of the fly line etching the smooth surface of the steel surface filled the still air.

And it was only replaced by three people breathing as the rod went tight and all hell broke loose!

I'm not sure if Jack picked up on the tension. He couldn't have possibly known the downhill slope Amelia had been on or why, though there were clues in a few dropped fish. And I guarantee that when that fish finally came to the net that he had no idea how much that fish meant to Amelia, to me, to us... he had no idea how much that one photo he took meant and what it represented in our fishing. As I somehow scooped the fish as I slipped on the oily rocks, I turned with the monster in the net and Amelia literally jumped in my arms. Happy?

Her poise had returned. She'd had enough. She stepped up. She did everything right. I didn't say a word. I didn't have to coddle her like I had to with one fellow I fished with, who failed miserably in New Zealand, unable to catch a sighted trout for 5 weeks, pouted mercilessly, and had to resort to deep nymphing under a bobber to catch trout. She stepped up. She made the choice to take charge.

And that's what impressed me most.

It didn't matter if the fish was a hair under 10-1/2 lbs, it was her poise and fight to the best possible end result that mattered.

Now, it's not like her eyes magically got better over night for the rest of the trip. She dropped a gimmie rainbow in a back eddy the next day due to optics (a short cast induced a downstream take and poor hook set) and needed help sighting another rainbow that evening in the contrasting light. BUT, things certainly got a lot better. By the end of the trip she was spotting very well for me. Of course, the weather also improved and that helped. While her eyes remain on the mend, and still slightly off, we look forward to the benefits of the eye procedure that slows the impacts of Keratoconus.

I guess I write this as an encouragement to anyone who might be going through a difficult time, either in life, in fishing, in health, or maybe feeling emotionally or mentally down. Life gets us. It just does. We aren't alone in that. We all go through something. All we can do, all we're called to do... is persevere the best we can. We all ask for help in our own ways, to feel connected, to do what we need to do to continue to persevere. And it's also in us to keep persevering with those around us that might be going through such an experience in life. I know it's contrite to compare a "woe is me I can't catch every fish" to someone who's depressed, has cancer, or has something going on in life, but the principle is the same: remaining committed to each other and persevering. I know in our future that a health issue will befall one or both of us. I'm also lucky enough to know that I'll have someone beside me that will be tenacious to the best possible outcome of the situation every day of that journey. And she has that as well.

Thursday, March 15, 2018

Will Ferrell Goes Fly Fishing

After floating hopelessly for a spell on a 'kind of' middle of nowhere reach of water, we decided to have a look at a bit of water running against a cliff bank 100 m up a side braid. We hopped out of the raft, walked over. I had taken the time to get myself over the narrow perch above a run and it wasn't until I looked in the top pocket in the upper reach of the run that I finally spotted fish. Amelia & our friend Jack then took the time to walk around to get in the proper position to work the one, large rainbow that was working the back water. It was a stunning fish to watch.
 
 
Not HUGE big, just big enough and doing a sexy enough bit of feeding to warrant the time to do it right... and get it all on video from my perch. It took 10 - 15 minutes for them to walk around and set up. Finally, they were in position. It was a windy day, wind howling loudly in the bush beside me. The riffled water beside them and the wind where I was meant that we had to pretty much yell to hear each other. Fair enough, we did what we had to and all was good.
Fast forward to later that afternoon. We were floating the main river past a good bit of water. The tailout had a great set of rocks. Amelia drift her flies past the rocks and a nice rainbow came to have a look but never took. It followed her fly 20 - 25 m but never committed. We pulled out below and beached the raft to walk back up to the rocks. I once again got up high to spot. I saw 3 rainbows in the wee pocket, only one was feeding.

Once more the wind was howling where I was. I could hardly hear for the wind in the matagouri bush. Assuming they had the same, I was yelling, LOUDLY. At one point, Amelia put her fly in the zone and a fish came to have a look "OH! HERE HE COMES!... ... ... REJECTED!" I yelled out. For the better bit of 10 minutes, I was givin'er vocally. It wasn't until I heard them muttering to themselves that I clued in. I said something in a normal, subdued voice and they both responded. Ah boy. Embarrassing! I'd just been yelling at them for 10 minutes when the accoustics where they were could have been normal talking! Uggh. As Jack said later, he'd never heard someone yell so loudly without being severely pissed off at him.
In hindsight, as I even sit here now, I'm still embarrassed by it. I kind of akin it to me being the Will Ferrell of fly fishing. In hindsight, my "REJECTED!" must have just seemed so Will Ferrell. I could easily see him doing a fly fishing movie, screaming out "REJECTED!!!".  For as much as I don't laugh at a lot of Will's movies, that would be a moment I would for sure. Awesome. I was there. Still embarrassed by it in my memory. Ah well. What can you do? Classic.

PS ~ Thanks to Jack Kos for the middle 2 pics. :)

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Mustad C49, Superfly HKP... and other hooky thoughts

I started out on the cheap in fly fishing. When you start fly tying and fishing at age 5, you take what you are given. You get a newspaper route (do they still have those?) and buy stuff at the Fishin' Hole in Edmonton, Christmas and birthdays and grade 4 report cards add to your tying collection. You do the best you can in your blissful ignorance. Having stuff is great, and you do with what you can afford. My uncle taught me enough about fly fishing to make me obsessed - actually I was born obsessive, he just directed my OC nature.

I've always used Mustad hooks. I loved the little cardboard boxes with wax paper wrappings and was sad when they went to the plastic clam shell packaging: it weakened the imagery. But I've never had issue with Mustad. Sure, I've read some on the internet go on about how poor quality the hooks are, etc. I always wondered why I'd never lost a fish to a bad Mustad hook but a few people are so anti the brand. Forward many years of fishing. I've broken points off some hooks in canyon/gorge settings. You can't always miss the rock walls behind you. That was never a big deal. The old, standard hooks always served me well. Through my teenage years, I got into tying small stonefly patterns on the fine wire, extended shank dry fly hooks. They worked well, floated, added thorax length to my patterns. I still enjoy the patterns and they hold up for 6 to 16" cutts in open situations, no issue.

It wasn't until 3 years ago on our third trip to New Zealand that I ever had any kind of issue. We'd started to tie more exclusively on Mustad C49 hooks, thanks to chironomid fishing influence up at Fortress Lake Retreat, with some brookies to 7 or 8 pounds landed on the hooks. They are great little hooks that offer a lifelike curve to chironomid patterns. I began to tie my stream nymphs on the hooks and really have loved the appearance of the patterns, and the and performance on our home waters with cutts and browns that tended to be less than 4 pounds (24") has been satisfactory. It got to the point all of our nymphs were being tied on C49s, but we'd not used them on larger river fish, and not yet in New Zealand.

So, what happened on our third trip to New Zealand? It was a mouse year. Imagine your local waters and taking the fattest trout in the river and doubling its weight, the fin muscles Popeye-ing in strength. It was my first NZ mouse year brown of 8 lbs that opened my eyes. The fish didn't do anything special. It jumped and ran in an open river situation. I was well into my backing a few times in the heavy current. You simply don't just reel large fish in when in heavy water. By the time the fish was to hand, the hook was bent out completely. Garbage. Fair enough, I'd given it a work out, I thought. But what I didn't know at the time was that trip was to become a one and done exercise. After every single fish, the C49 was completely bent out.
Every fish.
It got to the point on that trip that I'd hook up a 4 lb spring creek brown and do the usual fight, and either lose the fish for a bent out hook or land it and have to tie on a new fly. Of course we stopped using those patterns on fish that we really wanted.

It was the first time that we'd ever had any issue with Mustad. We haven't stopped using Mustad. No, we still love it, maybe because of habit, maybe because there is no need to change something that works for you. We're happy with Mustad in every other situation, likely always will be. I can only say good things about every other Mustad experience. Those C49s are great chironomid hooks and never failed us fishing lakes. But on bigger fish in moving water, I wouldn't use it again. I wouldn't risk the time and $ of a trip to New Zealand on that hook.

Now, forward to this year's trip to New Zealand. Obviously no C49s were on board. But, we took a flier on Superfly HKP hooks. Same idea, short shank, curved hook. Just Superfly's in house brand. The result was probably 50% better. Not perfect, but encroaching very reliable. There were some flies that lasted 1/2 doz fish, some that lasted not one, and some that went 3 days of fishing - it's all so subjective, from scenario to scenario, person to person, etc. When I hooked into one 7 1/2 lb brown from a spring creek on one particularly tough day of fishing toward the end of our trip, as I set the hook I said an "ah, shit" to myself, remembering instantly that I had a #18 curved hook nymph below my caddis. Being the first fish any of the 3 of us had hooked into that day I had to fight it less aggressively and be ginger-gentle as it came to net. It was the lingering negativity of our Mustad experience that had me so cautious. We got it, but when you have to adjust your fishing due to hook psychology, you wonder why you did that to yourself to begin with. But, the Superfly hook performed admirably.

If I was to give Mustad C49 an F for large fish in heavy water and a C for stream nymphs on other sized trout, and as close to an A for lake fish on chironomids... I'd give the Superfly HKPs a C+ for big fish in moving water and a B+ otherwise. But that's with the caveat that our/my top end is 12 - 14 river browns. No report on the Superfly hooks on lakes yet. That's just my/our experience.

My friend Nick recently wrote a blog post about hooks in his 8 cents a fly. Make sure you read his blog The Drag Free Drift, it's a great site. We've had the same discussion previously. Why cheap out on hooks? Now, I'm obviously not as strong in my views of that discussion, however, there are times to look at what we're doing. For us, for me, I'll always be a Mustad tier. But, I'd encourage you to look around at some of the reviews of various hooks and various hooks for the fishing scenario you plan to or could be exposed to. Most of the known brands will work well. To take a flier on an unknown? Not always a great idea. Again, for 8 cents...

Now, back to that #1 rule of the internet: to express an opinion, view, perspective, or experience is to invite one back! :)

Friday, March 9, 2018

Alberta Fishing Guide Magazine

Just spent a couple of days with Barry again and this year's Alberta Fishing Guide Magazine is now available at the Canadian Tire Stores in the Calgary - central Alberta - Edmonton areas, as well as the Fishin' Hole Calgary. The fly shops and the southern region will have them starting Monday.
 
Excellent article by Clive regarding Quality stocked fisheries. Like he, Barry, myself, and all the fisheries staff continue to repeat to those who just aren't getting it yet: they are a work in progress and we are further along the path to some great fisheries than the day we began not too long ago.
 
And hope you enjoy the cover. Last year Amelia's photo of a brown was on the cover, this year I was lucky enough to get this photo of a nice brook trout.
 
Cheers!
 

Sunday, February 25, 2018

Quietly Into the Night

We return to Alberta tomorrow. We leave New Zealand, with the leaves drying and willows turning yellow at the first signs of the changing season, late Feb eerily similar to late August at home - the warm, dry weather taking its toll on the trees. The rivers are low and warm. The nights only now cooling quite noticeably. The afternoons are calmer but take just a touch longer to warm. The highways are quiet. All is peaceful.
So it was on our last foray into the back country, to explore a new road and a couple of new valleys, mostly for the fun of it and definitely for next year's trip. The salmon are in many waters and the trout are a little more than just put off - they aren't happy their big, distant cousins are in the small habitat, and certainly aren't keen to share a bath tub.
So it was we were driving out from that last jaunt up a remote, lonely valley that we thought of a fish I'd missed on 3 successive rises to my mayfly. I stood above it high on the bank and each time it rose to my mayfly I struck early. The optics from above were starkly different to water level: from above you saw the head pop but you strike too soon often, as the large headed trophies need to turn or return to the water prior to striking. I missed each take back 6 weeks or so, simply pulling the fly out of an open mouth prior to that turn. It was at the end of the 5 weeks of high, muddy, miserable weather and water and that moment more frustrating because of the negative run of conditions.
But on this drive out the water was low, cold, clear. And there was enough time to walk over to the pool and see if it was there. We were close by and it was worth a look. And as we walked over and peered over the bank, the mayflies were popping and my fish was popping like mad.
It was epic. And I got him this go 'round. And it was the greatest moment and memory we'll both take with us from this trip. Me for being so engaged in the fishing, Amelia in the video. And it was epic.

Monday, February 12, 2018

Of Stauffer Cr and a thought to a True Biology opportunity in Alberta

Some thoughts of not just the state of Stauffer Cr, but also an idea to the future of how biology might be able to be performed in Alberta... the following is a posted reply to a thread on the Alberta Outdoorsman forum.
I'm by no means saying this is the way or that I'm 100% right - the idea is the discussion. If you have any thoughts, it would be great to hear them, either as a reply here or at the thread on the forum. This is something I've long wondered why doesn't happen (obvious budget concerns aside).
 
"Don, with full respect to the time you’ve spent on, in, and thinking of the creek, I say the following (and I am typing this from New Zealand with not a lot of time to proof this reply and re-read it to ensure that my thoughts are positive, clear, concise, and that I’m saying not only all that I hope to but not leading your mind the wrong direction... and that much of what I type you know and isn't at you rather, to add to the bigger picture)

I’ll get to this later in this post, but can you tell me what numbers are missing from the following data set?
236; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; 85; ?; ?;? ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; 300; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; 150; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?; ?
I do NOT want to argue the semantics because we are largely on the same page, but until you can prove that there is a problem, there is no problem, scientifically speaking. Gov types simply will not do anything lest there is a need displayed. I would strongly suggest that the data set above, or something very eerily similar, is the actual data set that the gov has for population and population dynamics through the years on Stauffer. AND, any bio worth any salt wouldn’t touch a guess on the true value of the missing numbers in the data set because so many factors, cycles, environmental conditions, etc could see the #s go either to 1000 or 2. The trouble with truly inconsistent data sampling in relation to natural processes is that unless you have consistency, you have NOTHING. I do not see things as dire as you do, but that’s ok. The point is that gov has ultimately done the statistical equivelant of NOTHING when it comes to population observation. That’s where we need to focus, regardless if you & I agree on the here and now. To take a snapshot sampling at random, irrelevant intervals is terrible and actually can be detrimental –> the 1000 trout/km survey could easily have come at a peak recruitment phase of the creek when the population was rebounding thanks to habitat restoration, thus giving false positives and false hope of what the creek actually can carry. Hence, for 27 years after such a # was achieved, statistically, the population has been going downhill. False positives are a horrible thing, made worse when the gov wants to ride the PR horse to show how good a job it’s doing when in fact the stream was simply responding to the band aids, rest, and ice given the chronic injuries it had suffered since homesteading came to central Alberta.

Next - and this is NOTHING personal, not at all about your knowledge or ability, but much of your data has holes so big that you can drive a Mac truck through it. I suspect that you know and can see this. The insect sampling size and anecdotal evidence of fish numbers declining for the ‘past 27 years’ means nothing scientifically (and I think to my own experience and tracking and say the same thing –> we’re anglers who care and our own circumstance can only hold so much water, clout, and pull in the larger picture of things). I know that you know this and addressed it in the desire to have professionals do what you are doing to a level that needs be done in order to determine what is going on, so hair on you for that. And yes, it sucks when we know there is something going on and we only have our own incomplete, lone fencepost on a grassy hill data set to reply upon.

I have to say the title of this thread –> IMHO is untrue and irrational in the bigger picture of things (I know what you mean and your intent to draw attention, so fair enough). Ecosystems are evolutionary, be it a forest or your front lawn, or a stream. Right now it appears that Stauffer has simply had a long, prolonged, repetitive hair cut. So much so that maybe we don’t know what she looks like with long hair anymore. All the facets and factors discussed here have impact, and cumulatively compounded over time take their toll. I relate it strongly to several estuarian river mouths here in NZ. The onslaught of dairy farm conversions here has seen an incredible toxic build up in the estuaries – to the point that the build up of toxic sludge is feet deep in many cases and nearly impossible to get rid of. You can clean up all you want upstream, but it will still take 1000 years for the force of water to wash out the 3 – 5 feet of sludge that has built up and is leeching out, either killing or mutating what life there is. Even at that, where does that sludge go once flushed but to another watershed (ocean). In the case of Stauffer, it is likely in the same predicament. The stream, however, is not dying. It may be enduring a responsive successionary stage that we don’t like because Alberta has become the sacrificial lamb to feed N American energy. Do we know if suckers and pike #s have changed at all? I digress because we know the answer is “I don’t know” from everyone because of the spaggetti to the wall mgt we’ve had in Ab for so long. But, we do need to accept that Alberta, as an engine to N America, is going to suffer environmentally. It is real and all we can do in our generation is attempt to keep a few pieces together until the oil/natural resource lusting ceases.

We need to stop thinking in terms of 20” trout. I’ve caught many 20+” trout in Stauffer through the years and some 24” trout from Stauffer in recent years would be outweighed by an 18” Ram cutthroat. Some streams in central Ab have simply seen their quality of fish dwindle since the flood. We need to start looking at the health of our fish like the QSF program looks at its fish –> snakey Fiesta fish vs MB Parkland trout. How do/can we get there with what we have? Better, given the insults, heavy use, etc, etc –> can we get healthy again? I was shocked at the Red Deer R last spring –> the males all had big heads and skinny tails; the females nothing more than snakey tubes. I’ve caught some skinny 25” browns on Stauffer the past few years that simply would have been more fiesty if they’d been willow branches. Where is the biomass going? Have we reached carrying capacity? Has carrying capacity gone downhill or have other species taken over? We’re asking the same questions, albeit it slightly differently.

Fisheries Mgt in Alberta has been a ‘thrown it against the wall until something sticks’ program since its inception. This is nothing to do with the people in the system as the system itself. There is no consistent stream specific biology occurring, even on the province’s showpiece (Bow). If that isn’t being managed with true biology thanks to budgets (and while the fishing is good the biology is truly suspect with spot/snapshot data sampling and little public involvement, etc), how do we go from there to stream specific biology? We’re still in the Wild West, but I strongly suspect we’re coming to the end of that era. You might not see it, I might/not, but the day is coming where river specific plans with true biology, enforcement, etc are to be done to ensure long term viability of our waters. This is where the merit of European waters management is positive. It will still be a long struggle, however, as the reckless ‘I’ll use whatever I want whenever I want’ attitude prevails along our eastern slopes. The slope to the bottom and the pinching of good trout waters is noticeable. The new wave will likely initially follow the template StreamWatch had –> private anglers and lobby groups coming together to do the gov’s job. Eventually such an entity will brow-beat the gov into either doing its job with proper funding or that entity will become an arm of gov that manages things. The time is likely right for a pilot project whereby private individuals, orgs, groups, etc come together on a (relatively) controlled environment such as Stauffer. Funds to be raised privately and works contracted out; in stream works co-ordinated by a central entity. And consistent, true biology carried out. Most importantly, if I can inject, that if you had an unlimited budget, time, etc, the term I suspect that is needed for what you/I etc would do for the stream is a Watershed Mgt Plan with a subordinate Fisheries Management Plan that carried out this true biology. And subsequently, annual surveys would be performed, enforcement carried out throughout the year, watershed concerns would be addressed and funnelled through the proper channels, etc. Stauffer would be a perfect scenario for this.

Before you come back and say it’s too late or that will take too much time, or how do we set up to do the above... recall that grass, trees, and yes, fish all grow. While we might not like where it’s at now, the only answer that the present gov fisheries mgt system will listen to is to show proof, to study things. So, I say, let’s get an arm reach entity set up and start doing some real biology on a stream in Alberta that combines some of the facets of Streamwatch (enforcement); some of the facets of SW that I wanted but never materialized (public inclusion and angler participation encouraged); annual sampling (angler use by reach, population dynamics, water quality, etc); determination of carrying capacity and biomass calculation; among the other things listed in this thread. To start something like this on Stauffer would be the ultimate legacy to your & Barry’s works through the decades and ensure that – while you aren’t happy with where it is presently – we can get the ecosystem stable in everyone’s mind. And, if we can get such a pilot project off the ground on Stauffer, it could then easily be duplicated to other waters or tighter regional fisheries (south, central, and north cutthroat stream management rather than managing the Torrens with the same brush as Daisy Cr, for example).

Again, while you & I won’t agree on the exact present condition of the creek (I’m moderately concerned, I see you as gravely concerned both for now and the future) that is immaterial in the bigger picture of where things are headed. If we could all come together and do something like the above over the long term, it would honor not only yourself, but every angler in this resource heavy province into the future. I think that the time for something like this is coming soon, if not now. This is essentially how Streamwatch started and something like this might be the next new wave.

Respectfully,

Dave

PS - Amelia just had a good idea that there are uni/college programs that could easily do a lot of this work as a curriculum addition. Given the proximity of Stauffer, it's a perfect hands on stream for the U of A; U of C; NAIT; RDC. And go from there...

Friday, February 2, 2018

This Tar Baby's Got No Rhythm

If you know the story of Brer Rabbit and the Tar Baby, you can appreciate that sometimes the harder we swing the worse it can get.
A month prior to flying to New Zealand Amelia & I were doing some hill sprinting in the snow at a golf course back home in Red Deer. We like to try to stay in shape. At the end of the work out, the last hill of course, I felt a blast of pain shoot up my right calf, like a zipper of pain coiling up. I couldn't walk. I tried my best the next  month to walk, but it hurt to do a lot of different motions. When we arrived in New Zealand, the first few weeks were brutal. My right knee doubled in size and the calf was still sore. Whatever I did was not getting much better. I simply couldn't walk the distances we normally do, but I tried. And the knee was simply just there to swing my leg... kind of a jelly feel. Some days were simply hopeless for the pain, others for the numbness and weak feel.

About the time I finally clued in and had the means to do so - I started icing and taking Voltaren (thanks to our friends here who happen to be in the medicine field) Amelia took a nasty tumble while crossing a paddock. She was putting the electric fence back up, turned, and took a step. That step landed in a grass covered hole that had a hidden, old post. All I know is that I turned around to hear her writhing in pain. She was hurt pretty good and the bruise just kept getting sexier to look at over the next week or two.

We fished, we made do, we struggled physically to keep going, but we did. The fishing was ok those first few weeks. Actually quite good but when you are struggling physically, you know you just aren't on top of it all.

AJ got better, the ice and Voltaren started to work a little, and just as we were ready to roll, the weather hit. For a month. Literally 4 weeks of every 18 to 36 hrs a major front of 100 - 600mm. 2 vertical feet of rain in 20 hours is stunning to see the effects of. But this is New Zealand and there is always a place to fish, and we did quite well. But the trip continued to be a Brer. We kept swinging, kept taking a best stab, best jab. Never quite on top of it. The trip was going well, it just didn't have the feel of any rhythm.

It was during a big rain event that we decided to take a couple of days to hike and raft with our friends. And that's when my big break through came. We hiked to a mountain top one day and I had been stretching out my knee, my calf, and trying to get loose. On our way down the mountain I decided to give my knee all it could handle. I ran down the mountain. Literally. And my knee loosened up, big time. It was ironic: I hurt my leg sprinting up hill in the snow at home; my leg instantly felt better running down hill in summer in New Zealand. And it has been pretty much 100% since. Who knew?

We set out for our latest jaunt 3 weeks ago from our friends' place. We left in a heck of a rain storm that turned to a dump of wet snow as we drove across the tops. The rivers were high, muddy. 2 days later, it was 30C and the past 2 - 3 weeks have been an amazing run of weather. The trip that had zero rhythm changed that day. Like any good cutthroat trout stream at home, these New Zealand trout need a good run of fine weather to get going, to get in their rhythm. And in turn, our trip has a solid rhythm to it. So much so that today, a cloudy day (dare we say finally!), we're back at our friends' place. Amelia's baking banana bread, we'll have a jug of coffee, and sometime after lunch we'll head down to the local river to fish a 2km side channel for a soft, 'off' day. Tomorrow is a heavy rain day so we'll finally take a day off the water and maybe do a little more blogging, sharing more shots like these. Of course, if you want to see more photos and are on Facebook, check out our Jensen Fly Fishing Facebook Page.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

A Red Deer River Look - Alike

We finally had things line up, so we could get the raft on the water. Its first voyage of 2013 was great. Both Dave and I have been itching to use our boat since we got to the south island, but the weather has dealt us some big blows this year with rains turning many floatable rivers off color and high for extended periods. The last 2 days the stars aligned and gave us blue skies and some decent water conditions to head off and explore a west coast river. It turned out to be a really relaxing float with only a few spots to drive hard with the paddles, although we welcomed the new exercise.One of the highlights was watching our friend Serge get a smash of a take on top for the first time pounding cicadas from the front of the raft as Dave and I lined him up on banks to fish the edges. Another highlight was beaching the raft on the side of the river and exploring feeder streams and spring creeks that join the river - waters that you wouldn't otherwise be able to fish due to access. The main river we chose to raft  reminded us so much of our home water, the Red Deer river. For those of you familiar with the Red Deer, you'll see what I mean. Same banks (full of left over logs and beaten down bushes after high water), same long glides, some similar sized fish and even a few poplar stands on the side of the river to boot! Pretty neat to feel so at home in so many ways here.





 

Monday, January 8, 2018

Red Deer River Fisheries Mgt Plan Meetings

After 10 years pestering the bio for the river, we began process on the revisitation of the 20 year old Fisheries Management Plan for the Red Deer River. It's an issue close to me personally as I love process and find it to be a fascinating, yet somewhat underfined river. I've been trying for years to get the RDR FMP revisited but there was resistence due to a few factors, and after getting a few others on side we got this this advisory group going - a WELCOME process. Thanks to the gov for stepping up!
While I am personally in New Zealand as yet, I'll be back to be a part of process late Feb and am really looking forward to the discussion when we return.
To date, discussion has occurred within the committee and the public involvement process at this early stage of the review is through 2 mtgs in January.
One will be in Trochu and the other in Red Deer.
It will be great to hear feedback at this stage of things, which, at present, essentially looks at the issues affecting the watershed.
Hope you can make the mtgs.
Cheers,
Dave Jensen

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

The Coolest Experience

It's not as though we didn't know what was coming, what we were getting into. But, in New Zealand, sometimes you have to stare into the eyes of a tiger and then take a claw in the face. We had seen the weather forecast. 2 days of fine weather (which, again, stands for no monsoons but could be sunny, cloudy, some rain, and a variety of wind - or all these), then the bottom was to drop out. When the forecasters give the map at right, you take notice.
From the map, heavy rainfall warnings start at 100mm in a few hours duration here, with significant heavy rainfalls that we've seen in the 600mm in less than 24 hrs (that's 24" depth of rain, incomprehnsible to Albertans who freak out over 75mm of rain). Serious rain. Severe gales start at 120kmh and have gone to gusts of 140-160kmh. Spillover rain is when the west coast rains come over the divide, which when combined with severe gales can make the rain being pushed from 30km away feel like pellets from a BB gun hitting you en masse.
 
As it was, we chose to hit a small stream for a couple of days and, the day the first front was forecast was to arrive, we hit a spring creek. Again, the first 2 days were cloudy but warm. The spring creek day the first front smoked us... hard. We got 150mm in 8 hrs just as we got to our favorite glides. AJ missed a 10+lb brown that we got a big white mouth take on video from. As she set, the mouth opened to chew the nymph and she pulled it out of its mouth. A huge trout. Alas, that was it for that side of the island as we woke to a FULL, black river beside our van. When van camping, you try to avoid being wet, so our choice, given the above forecast map, was to head east, hoping that the associated forecast that called for a severe threat of spill-over precip held off before deluging. Hopefully it would give us a day or two.
We drove over the divide in pouring rain, rain that ebbed as we came down the east side and turned to hot, dry wind. We went from a saturated rain forest to a dry tussockland (bunch grasses). In about 80 km as the crow flies. That's the dramatic New Zealand ecosystem changes.

We got one amazing weather day in on the eastern divide - albeit in howling winds. The sun was present a short spell then disapeared as the leading edge of the next front came in, with only a minor spill over rain in the distance.




The interesting hilight of that day was coming across a nice rainbow from a corner pocket pool at the top end of the stream. It was the exact fish that we caught in the exact pool as last year.

The next day, as the major front was to come in (Jan 2), we woke to a freight train of a wind. A head wind to boot. Trees were pushed over, some snapping. The stands of HUGE pine were screaming, forcing Amelia & I to yell to hear each other - from about 6 feet apart. We woke that morning to an amazing morning Nor'wester rainbow. Morning Nor'wester rainbows are formed when the easterly rising sun reflect the spillover rains to the west. As the fronts roll from the Tasman Sea, they hit the alps and head NE, following the chain. When a massive front comes in, it can push over the top. That's what this one had in mind.

The morning was nice, full of broken sun and a warm wind. Amelia photographed the rainbow, we enjoyed a morning coffee, then set out for a fish. So warm, I opted to wear a thin shirt, AJ 3 layers in case the distant spill over grew. And it would. By the time we walked downstream to our start point, the rain from the tops was driven upon us in the 120+kmh winds. It was a driving headwind. The trout spotted took some 30 minutes to time good casts to the right spots.
 
Our fortunate streak of good fishing continued through this wind and pellet-like driven rain.
 


Then the yo-yo effect began. A deluge came and the black clouds from the tops spewed east, then retreated. The sun popped out before the next push of the western front fought back. The distant western skies turned white with sun lit rain, replaced by black as the front pushed up again. It was literally directly over head, fighting all day long. Over and over this repeated itself as the wind continued to roar. By 4pm the skies turned jet black. We were soaked. My decision to wear a thin shirt on this fine day? Dumb. I shook as I cast at given trout, no longer wanting or caring to hook up. I defered to AJ to fish. I was frozen in the dropping temps and the driving rain. As it came to the last run - we couldn't take it any more - I could barely hold a firm rod. I thought I could see a dark shadow under Amelia's feet along the bank. My last cast of the day revealed a heavy rainbow that I could hardly hold due to numb hands.
AJ was soaked from driven rain yet the sun shone on her as she released a beautiful brown.
By 5:30 pm the valley began to fill with lightning and thunder, a once a year event for the valley. Oddly, the ebb-flow of the front continued as the lighting came overhead then retreated west. All night though the next morning the lightning literally came overhead, then retreated west. Black and clear went the weather.
 
By morning the spring creek and small streams of the valley were swollen as the river on the other side of the mountain in the valley jumped over and filled the entirety of the whole valley, filling the streams and spring creeks. About a mile or so wide. In less than 12 hrs of rain.
We'd been warned by our local friend in that valley that the river would likely do just that, and told us to get out if we had the opportunity as the road could easily wash us out for a few days. When we awoke, we were able to leave. When we got to our other friends' place on the other side of the island 3 hrs later, we saw that valley was completely flooded and the road under water less than an hour after we left.





The west coast rain totalled 600mm in 18 hrs.



6 - 18" of snow hit the tops as the front moved through and temperatures swooned.

The rivers? SWOLLEN. A west coast river swelled 24 vertical feet.  Check out the river chart at left and consider the units of depth and time, and how quickly the rise and fall!
Flood waters hit the eastern waters. West coast rivers ripped bridges, flooding highways, and major slips closed 3 of the 4 routes through the north and western area of the island.

A short news video: http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/deluge-cuts-off-west-coast-video-5309821

The irony? 2 days later, we're sight-fishing clear water. Alberta waters would be toast for the season, as 2005 showed. It's a country formed from this extreme weather, it can handle it. The people simply have to adjust. And life goes on. So, we were forced to have a day and a half off fishing. Tomorrow, we're back at it at a high country spring creek we stumbled upon 2 weeks ago but never had time to fully investigate it as it was at the end of the day and we'd had 3 flat tires that day already and needed to make sure we got back (another tale of back country NZ roads and hard times!). That's the life and times of the west->east coast environments. And what keeps you on your toes in New Zealand! Always an adventure...